SASSA Ends Postbank Partnership: COSATU Warns Of Rising Bank Charges For Grant Recipients

The Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has objected very strongly to the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) decision to break the long-standing partnership with the Postbank. COSATU claims the decision was made without consulting the stakeholders involved and without considering the impact of the change on the recipients of the grants, notably those who are dependent on the safe and low-cost banking alternatives. The trade union federation adds that the millions of social grant beneficiaries could now be subjected to higher bank fees and less reliable access to their payments.

Vulnerable Grant Recipients At Risk

The previous system allowed Postbank to be the grantee bank which paid out the beneficiaries through a network of free and easily accessible ATM’s regardless of the location. COSATU is of the opinion that moving to commercial banks might result in deductions at the time of cash withdrawal, transaction fees, or even beneficiaries having to go all the way to a branch to get their money. For the majority of the beneficiaries even such small banking fees or inconvenience can cause a great deal of suffering. COSATU believes that this transition goes counter to the government’s financial inclusion and protection of the poorest citizens’ rights.

Rationale And Response Of The Government

The Department of Social Development justifies the decision by outlining its plan to streamline financial management at SASSA and ensure compliance with the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA). Government officials argue that the change will lead to a reduction in administrative costs and place disbursement under the authorities’ financial governance goals. Nevertheless, the critics maintain that these arguments are not taking into consideration the everyday challenges that the vulnerable recipients have to cope with.

There is a strong public expectation that the government will offer a transparent, inclusive transition plan that will not impose a burden on social grant users.

What Must Be Done: Safeguards & Collaboration

COSATU is pressuring SASSA and Postbank to at least partially reconsider the transition or to take it more slowly. Possible methods consist of:

  • A gradual handover instead of a sudden cutoff 
  • Dialogue with and input from stakeholders in the beneficiary groups, unions, NGOs
  • Imposition of a limit or regulation on the charges of banks for grant accounts
  • Application of digital payments (mobile banking, wallets) as means of cutting costs and barriers

COSATU reiterates that disputes between institutions should not come in the way of the welfare of over 19 million beneficiaries. 

Outlook & Grant Recipients’ Observations

The separation between SASSA and Postbank is formally announced, but still a lot depends on the details of the implementation. If the transition is not managed well, the poor, already vulnerable populations might suffer the most, as they would be faced with the consequences of delays, cost burdens, and reduced access. Hence, grant recipients should monitor official announcements closely, verify the banks participating in the new payment system, and stay abreast of any temporary waivers or relief measures that might be declared by the government.

Also Read: Goodbye to Retirement at 65: South Africa’s New Retirement Age Explained

Leave a Comment